Tokyo Condos Average $800K. I Didn't Know About Japan's Variable Rate "5-Year Rule" Until My Payments Went Up
How Japan's variable-rate mortgage rules work, and what I learned after my rate doubled without warning
Table of Contents
- 80% of Borrowers Are on Variable Rates
- The “5-Year Rule” Nobody Explained to Me
- The 125% Rule Isn’t a Safety Net Either
- My Bank Didn’t Even Have the 5-Year Rule
- What Happens When Rates Go to 2%
- Low Rates Inflated Prices. Now Both Are Rising.
- Three Things Variable-Rate Borrowers Should Do Now
- Know the Rules, Watch the Numbers
The average price of a used condo in Tokyo’s 23 wards hit ¥120 million ($800,000) in February 2026.
I bought mine for ¥35 million ($233,000) eight years ago. Even then, I thought it was expensive. Spent weeks looking at places between ¥30–50 million, trying to convince myself it was a reasonable purchase.
That ¥35 million is now ¥120 million. A 3.4x increase. Doesn’t feel real.
And variable mortgage rates — which is what about 80% of Japanese borrowers have, including me — just crossed 1% for the first time in 15 years. When I signed my mortgage in 2018, I got 0.45%.
Condo prices up 3.4x. Interest rates more than doubled. If you’re buying now, or already on a variable rate… there’s something you should understand about how Japanese mortgages actually work.

80% of Borrowers Are on Variable Rates
Japan’s Housing Finance Agency reports that 75–84% of mortgage borrowers chose variable rates. That’s 4 out of 5 people.
Here’s what major banks are charging in April 2026:
| Bank | Variable Rate (Best Rate) |
|---|---|
| MUFG Bank | 0.945% |
| SMBC | 1.275% |
| Mizuho Bank | 1.225–1.675% |
| PayPay Bank | 0.980% |
| au Jibun Bank | 1.134% |
| SBI Sumishin Net Bank | 1.200% |
When I refinanced to PayPay Bank, I got 0.6%. New borrowers at the same bank now get 0.98%. Same bank, worse deal. That window closed.
The “5-Year Rule” Nobody Explained to Me
Here’s what I wish someone had told me.
When I borrowed ¥30 million on a variable rate, the bank didn’t explain the 5-year rule. The real estate agent mentioned it in passing. That was it.
Japan’s variable-rate mortgages have two built-in mechanisms: the 5-Year Rule and the 125% Rule. They sound reassuring. They’re not.
The 5-Year Rule: rates are reviewed every 6 months (April and October), but your monthly payment stays fixed for 5 years. Even if rates jump from 0.6% to 1.5%, your bank withdrawal doesn’t change.
Sounds great, right? Here’s the catch.
The payment amount stays the same, but what’s inside changes. More goes to interest, less to principal. You’re paying every month, but your loan balance barely moves. In extreme cases — if rates spike high enough — your monthly payment can’t even cover the interest. That’s called “unpaid interest.” You’re making payments, and your debt is growing. Nightmare stuff.
The 125% Rule Isn’t a Safety Net Either
After 5 years, your payment gets recalculated. But the increase is capped at 125% of your previous amount.
If you were paying ¥150,000/month, the max becomes ¥187,500. No sudden doubling.
But this is just deferral. Whatever principal you didn’t pay gets pushed to the back. When your 35-year term ends, everything left — principal plus unpaid interest — is due in a lump sum.
The 5-year rule and 125% rule are shock absorbers. They don’t reduce your debt. Think of it like an adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) in the US, but with the rate changes hidden behind a fixed payment facade.

My Bank Didn’t Even Have the 5-Year Rule
Here’s where it gets personal.
I originally borrowed from Sony Bank at 0.45% variable (plus 0.2% for expanded life insurance, so 0.65% effective). Later, Sony Bank’s rate rose to 0.9%. With insurance: 1.1%.
What I noticed was simply: “Wait, my payment went up. When did that happen?”
Turns out Sony Bank doesn’t apply the 5-year rule or 125% rule. Rate increases hit your payment immediately. I had no idea.
SBI Shinsei Bank is the same way. If you’re on a variable rate, check whether your bank applies these rules. Right now.
I eventually refinanced to PayPay Bank at 0.6%, got approved for standard life insurance (couldn’t before due to mental health history), and dropped the extra ¥60,000/year surcharge. That was a good move.
What Happens When Rates Go to 2%
The Bank of Japan’s policy rate is currently 0.75%. Nomura Securities’ main scenario has it reaching 1.5% by 2027. Variable mortgage rates could climb to 1.5–2.5%.
Here’s what that looks like for different loan amounts. Starting rate: 0.5%, 35-year term, rate change at year 5.
¥50 Million Loan (~$333K, typical for eastern Tokyo)
| Rate at Year 5 | Monthly Payment | Monthly Increase | Annual Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5% (unchanged) | ¥129,793 | — | — |
| 1.5% | ¥149,718 | +¥19,925 | +¥239K |
| 2.0% | ¥160,346 | +¥30,554 | +¥367K |
¥70 Million Loan (~$467K, typical for southern/western Tokyo)
| Rate at Year 5 | Monthly Payment | Monthly Increase | Annual Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5% (unchanged) | ¥181,710 | — | — |
| 1.5% | ¥209,605 | +¥27,896 | +¥335K |
| 2.0% | ¥224,485 | +¥42,775 | +¥513K |
On a ¥70 million loan, a rate increase to 2% means an extra ¥42,775 per month. That’s ¥513,000 per year — roughly $3,400 — straight out of your take-home pay.
And central Tokyo’s average (Chiyoda, Chuo, Minato wards) is ¥160 million for 70m². At those numbers, the impact is even more brutal.
Low Rates Inflated Prices. Now Both Are Rising.
When I bought in 2018, rates were around 0.4–0.5%. Low rates meant low monthly payments, which meant people could “afford” higher-priced properties. Real estate agents knew this. Prices got pushed up because the monthly math still worked.
Low rates, high prices. It felt like a wash.
But now? Rates are up AND prices are up. Both dials turned the wrong way at the same time.
My honest opinion: this isn’t a great time to buy in Tokyo. For prices to make sense, they need to come down as rates go up. Otherwise the math just doesn’t work for regular working people.
But I also know that people said “don’t buy now” in 2018, and my ¥35 million condo might be worth ¥45–50 million today. Real estate timing is, to use the technical term, a gamble.
The only safe rule: buy what you can afford if rates hit 2%. Not what you can afford at today’s rate.

Three Things Variable-Rate Borrowers Should Do Now
For those already on a variable rate — here’s what I actually do.
First: check whether your bank applies the 5-year rule. Sony Bank and SBI Shinsei don’t. I learned this the hard way.
Second: watch fixed-rate trends. When the gap between variable and fixed narrows enough, it’s time to consider refinancing. The gap is shrinking.
Third: set your own “trigger point” for prepayment. Mine is: reconsider at 2%, seriously evaluate lump-sum prepayment at 3%. Having a rule prevents anxiety-driven decisions every time rates tick up.
Know the Rules, Watch the Numbers
Eight years ago I bought at ¥35 million, variable rate 0.45%. Rate went up to 0.9% without me noticing. Refinanced to 0.6%. Could go up again.
Whether that was the right call — honestly, I’ll only know in retrospect.
But the version of me who didn’t understand the 5-year rule, and the version who does, will handle the next rate increase very differently.
Real estate and interest rates are unpredictable. That’s exactly why you learn the rules and watch the numbers. For a regular salaryman like me, that’s really all there is to do.
This article reflects personal experience and research, not financial or real estate advice. Please consult professionals for decisions specific to your situation.
Related Articles
I Ran the Numbers on Japan's New 'Singles Tax.' Even as a Parent, I Can't Celebrate
Japan started collecting a new childcare support levy from every worker's paycheck in April 2026. I broke down the costs and benefits for my own household — the math surprised me.
I Have ¥50M in Assets. I Still Don't Know What I'm Doing About My Daughter's Education.
A Japanese salaryman with ¥50M in assets breaks down education costs, school choices, and why he refuses to call it an "investment"
¥170K a Month on Food for Three. Here's Where Every Yen Goes.
A dual-income Japanese family of three breaks down their ¥170K monthly food costs and explains why they won't cut back despite April's price hikes