Japan's 5% Wage Hike Made Headlines. My Raise Was Zero.
A 40-something salaryman breaks down his ¥350K take-home pay and explains why he stopped caring about raises
Table of Contents
- The Morning the 5.26% News Broke
- What 5.26% Actually Means (and Doesn’t)
- Over the Past 3 Years, I Think It Went Up About 3%
- When I Stopped Expecting Anything from My Salary
- Where All ¥350K Goes
- I Stopped Thinking in Monthly Budgets
- An Unexpected Side Effect of Investing
- Nobody at the Office Talks About Pay
- The Comfort of Having Two Pillars
- A Salaryman-Investor’s Take on the 5.26% Headlines
The Morning the 5.26% News Broke
March 2026. I’m eating breakfast, TV on. The spring wage negotiation results flash across the screen.
“Wage increases average 5.26% — third consecutive year above 5%.”
Huh.
I opened my pay stub on my phone. My raise this year? Zero. Base pay increase? Also zero. I already knew, obviously. But seeing it right after a 5.26% headline hits different.

Weirdly, I wasn’t angry. “Yeah, that sounds about right” was my honest reaction.
What 5.26% Actually Means (and Doesn’t)
Let me break that number down.
The Japanese Trade Union Confederation (Rengo) compiled results from 1,100 unions as of March 23rd. Here’s what the headline doesn’t tell you:
| Category | Wage Increase |
|---|---|
| Overall average | 5.26% |
| Large companies (300+ employees) | 5.40% |
| Small/mid companies (under 300) | 5.05% |
| Typical raise for workers in their 40s | ~1.9% (about ¥3,000/month) |
These numbers come from unionized companies — already a filtered sample. Think Keidanren members. The big names.
And then there’s the age factor. Companies are pouring budgets into starting salaries and retention for 20-somethings. If you’re in your 40s, you’re not the priority. One survey found 37% of workers in their 40s got zero raise.
More than one in three. I’m not alone.
Over the Past 3 Years, I Think It Went Up About 3%
Looking back at the last two or three years, my base pay probably went up around 3%. I say “probably” because I honestly don’t remember the exact number.
Did I feel the difference in take-home pay?
Not really. “That’s about what I expected” was the extent of my reaction.
Here’s why: social insurance premiums in Japan now eat over 20% of your paycheck. Starting April 2026, there’s a new “childcare support levy” on top of that. A 3% gross increase, after deductions, is basically noise.
Gross goes up → take-home stays flat. That’s the structure.
When I Stopped Expecting Anything from My Salary
I can pinpoint when I stopped caring about raises.
It was when I gave up on climbing the corporate ladder. I stepped down from a management position — basically acknowledged that the promotion track was over for me. Around the same time, I started investing seriously.
Before that, I’d been planning my life around the assumption that salary would keep going up. Japan’s seniority-based pay system (年功序列) means your income theoretically rises with age. Twenty more years, decent salary, comfortable retirement — that kind of math.
Investing flipped that assumption.
My salary stopped being a growth engine. It became fuel for investments.
The thing that grows is my portfolio, not my paycheck. Once that mental shift happened, I stopped checking my pay stub with any real emotion.
Where All ¥350K Goes
So here’s what I actually do with ¥350K in take-home pay:
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| FANG+ (index fund) | ¥100,000 |
| NASDAQ 100 (index fund) | ¥50,000 |
| iDeCo (Japan’s 401k equivalent) | ¥20,000 |
| Mortgage + condo fees | Most of the rest |
| What’s left in my account | Basically nothing |
¥170,000 per month goes to investments. Nearly half my take-home.

“Isn’t that a deficit?” Yeah, if you only look at my account. We cover living expenses by combining my wife’s income with mine. She fills in what I can’t.
But I’ve never thought of it as a deficit.
I Stopped Thinking in Monthly Budgets
This might be the most important thing I want to say.
“Squeezing ¥X from this month’s budget for investments” — doesn’t that sound exhausting?
You have to track spending. Calculate if you’re in the red or black. This month you overspent on groceries so you skip investing. Next month you try to make up for it. That mental load is brutal.
I quit that approach entirely.
What I’m doing is simpler: gradually moving cash savings into investments.
I look at our household’s total assets as a portfolio. Cash vs. invested. Right now we have about ¥8.5 million in cash, and our ratio is roughly 22% cash / 78% invested. My target is 10-15% cash. Since we’re both working, ¥5 million in cash feels like enough of a safety net. That means I’ve still got room to keep moving money into investments.
So monthly being “in the red” doesn’t bother me. I’m watching the portfolio, not the household ledger.
When cash drops below ¥5 million, I’ll dial back. Simple as that.
An Unexpected Side Effect of Investing
Here’s something I didn’t expect.
My stress about salary being flat? Completely gone. I don’t expect anything from it, so there’s nothing to be disappointed about.
But — and this is the nuance — I still care about my work being recognized. I work hard. If my actual work goes unappreciated, that stings. But that’s a different kind of frustration from “my pay is too low.”
Investing let me separate those two things.
Before, it was all tangled: job performance = salary = self-worth. Can’t get promoted = can’t get a raise = I’m a failure. That chain was suffocating.
Now, work is work. Money is money. They run on different tracks.

Nobody at the Office Talks About Pay
Even when the spring wage news drops, salary doesn’t come up at work.
I’m curious, sure. I wonder what my peers are making. But when I’m with coworkers, I’d rather talk about something fun. Salary talk goes one of two ways: if someone got a raise, it sounds like bragging; if they didn’t, it’s complaining. Either way, the vibe gets weird.
So I don’t ask. Don’t tell. The only time money comes up at home is when I’ve had a good bonus and mention it to my wife.
The Comfort of Having Two Pillars
Writing this, I realized something.
The reason “yeah, that sounds about right” is my reaction to zero raise — instead of panic — is because I have a second pillar. Investing.
If salary were my only income source, seeing 5.26% in the news while getting zero would cut deeper. “Why not me?” “Should I switch companies?” “What am I even doing here?” — my mind would spiral.
On the flip side, investing alone would be rough too. When the market tanks — like right now with the Middle East crisis melting my unrealized gains — having a steady paycheck is what lets me think “I can wait this out.”
Salary and investments. Either one alone is fragile. Two pillars means when one shakes, you’re still standing on the other.
A Salaryman-Investor’s Take on the 5.26% Headlines
Salary matters. Seriously. It’s how you measure your market value, and it’s the raw material for investing. Pay attention to whether you’re getting raises.
But betting everything on raises is risky. Especially in your 40s, when effort and compensation stop correlating in Japan’s corporate structure.
So I run investments in parallel. It reduces my dependence on raises.
Investing ¥170K per month for 8 years got me past ¥50 million in total assets. During that same period, my salary went up maybe 3%. But my net worth multiplied.
If you’re a 40-something salaryman who saw the 5.26% headline and thought “that’s got nothing to do with me” — you’re right. And it’s fine. Just quietly build a second pillar alongside your paycheck.
That’s what I’ve been doing at 4 AM, every morning, without telling anyone.
This article reflects personal experience and is for informational purposes only — not investment advice. All investment decisions are your own responsibility.
Related Articles
I Have ¥50M in Assets. I Still Don't Know What I'm Doing About My Daughter's Education.
A Japanese salaryman with ¥50M in assets breaks down education costs, school choices, and why he refuses to call it an "investment"
¥170K a Month on Food for Three. Here's Where Every Yen Goes.
A dual-income Japanese family of three breaks down their ¥170K monthly food costs and explains why they won't cut back despite April's price hikes
I Ran the Numbers on My iDeCo Exit Tax — Turns Out I Can Just Take It All at 60
¥10M retirement + ¥10M iDeCo. I simulated lump sum vs pension payout and the answer surprised me.